I
can remember playing Follow the Leader as a young child
in the schoolyard. First, the group of children would choose a
leader or "head of the line" from the group. Next, all of us would
form a line behind the chosen leader. The leader then moved around and all the
children had to mimic the leader's actions. Any player who failed to follow or
do what the leader did was out of the game. The last person standing other than
the leader was the new leader. A simple children’s game, a great deal of fun,
unless you were one of the kids who found himself or herself out of the game
continually because you simply couldn't follow and mimic the actions
of someone more skilled than you.
I
don’t think I will ever think of Follow the Leader as a simple
children’s game again after reading the article Orchestrate the
Conflict, excerpted from Leadership on the Line by Ronald
A. Heifetz and Marty Linsky.
Heifetz
and Linsky offer the idea that “differences in perspective are the engine of
human progress.” They go on to explain that when a person encounters a difference
that challenges his own background of experience, a transformation or learning
takes place. Heifetz and Linsky then explain the ways to create change in
people. One clear-cut example of a well-known transformation was the change
that was driven by a number of differences in perspective within the company
known as KPMG. This company, an audit, tax and advisory company deals with
helping other companies to improve. They accomplish this improvement by
developing a rich understanding of a client company and its operations. Based
on the experience that KPMG has learned over its existence, KPMG makes
recommendations for the client company to follow in order to improve. The story
of KPMG’s own transformation by allowing connection, collaboration, and creativity
among employees to develop in their own company provided some insight into a
new version of the Follow the Leader “game.”
“Controlling the
Heat” is one of the methods that Heifetz and Linsky explain for creating a
change in the mindset of people. One controls the heat by raising and/or
lowering the temperature or amount of stress present in a situation. Heifetz and Linsky present a chart dealing with the
methods of raising and lowering stress levels as one orchestrates the conflict. Raising
the temperature causes tensions to rise; lowering the temperature allows the
people involved to feel a calmness that they can understand and work to
continue.
I’d
like to try to orchestrate the conflict in a class to see if it would enhance
the learning of my students. With young men, I think a teacher would find it an
easy task to control the heat that students feel when facing a challenging
assignment or assessment. Teaching the students not to overreact to a challenge
might be beneficial addition to their arsenal of tools that they use in their
learning. Teaching them the negatives of placing oneself in a pressure
situation by not being as prepared as they should be might help the students to
view assignments and assessments as something with which they can succeed.
If I had understood
the concept in the schoolyard game of Follow the Leader, perhaps I
would have been able to take the leader’s role from my friend Frank who
understood that when I was close to taking the leader’s position, I couldn't follow
the leader and do those twenty-five push-ups as he could. My best at the time
was twenty.
No comments:
Post a Comment